Skip to content

ViralLoop

Your next post already worked.

← Back to the post

Loading the post

Remix this post

SaveShare

Your note

Private to you, and used when you remix this post.

Viral score

Why it worked

The mechanics

Hook
Style
Tone
Written for

Analysis by ViralLoop — not written by the original author.

Matthew Green on AI · ViralLoop

← Back to the post

Post by Matthew Green on X

Matthew Green@matthew_d_green

But if you send your tasks out to servers in “the cloud” (god using quotes makes me feel 80), this means sending incredibly private data off your phone and out over the Internet. That exposes you to spying, hacking, and the data hungry business model of Silicon Valley. 4/

1.3K likes6 repliesPosted Jun 10, 2024

View the original on X Written by Matthew Green. Captured Sep 4, 2026.

Remix this post

Your note

Private to you, and used when you remix this post.

43

Viral score

Based on absolute engagement — the platform doesn’t expose follower counts here, so large accounts score higher.

From likes, comments.

Why it worked

Short enough to read in full without expanding, which removes a step before the point lands.
Short sentences keep the pace up, so the reader never has to re-read a line.
Quotes someone directly, which makes the moment concrete rather than summarised.

The mechanics

Hook: Plain observation
Structure: Hook → Landing
Style: Conversational paragraphs at a steady pace.
Tone: personal
Written for: People building with AI

Analysis by ViralLoop — not written by the original author.

Topics

Posts built the same way

Attorney General Pamela Bondi

At my direction, early this morning federal agents arrested Don Lemon, Trahern Jeen Crews, Georgia Fort, and Jamael Lydell Lundy, in connection with the coordinated attack on Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota. More details soon.

For those confused why the US state and Silicon Valley are having a meltdown on twitter today. China released multiple AI models that are 50x more efficient than the best American AI models and made them open source, ruining the AI market

Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.

I am very excited about AI, but to go off-script for a minute: I built an app with Codex last week. It was very fun. Then I started asking it for ideas for new features and at least a couple of them were better than I was thinking of. I felt a little useless and it was sad.

Hi! I'm one of the prompt writers that worked on this ad. It's a lot harder than people think! Prompts that my team used include: -make it funny -make it epic AND funny -funnier!!! Please be nice to my team as many of them will be laid off/replaced by AI

It’s patently absurd that Apple isn’t smart enough to make their own AI, yet is somehow capable of ensuring that OpenAI will protect your security & privacy! Apple has no clue what’s actually going on once they hand your data over to OpenAI. They’re selling you down the river.

More from Matthew Green

But more broadly, this highlights a fundamental weakness. If MS can easily produce this data to law enforcement, then anyone who compromises their cloud infrastructure (or customer service infrastructure; or can forge a plausible LE request) can potentially access that data.

Micah Lee is spending his weekend poking through the TeleMessage Signal app source code. So far it looks like they use hard-coded credentials. I’m sure it’s going to produce exciting results in the future. t.co

You should use Signal. Seriously. There are other encrypted messaging apps out there, but I don’t have as much faith in their longevity. In particular I have major concerns about the sustainability of for-profit apps in our new “AI” world.

So Apple has introduced a new system called “Private Cloud Compute” that allows your phone to offload complex (typically AI) tasks to specialized secure devices in the cloud. I’m still trying to work out what I think about this. So here’s a thread. 1/

It’s not weird for a CEO to say “my product is better than your product.” But when the claim is about security and critically, *you’ve made a deliberate decision not to add security for most users* then it exists the domain of competition, and starts to feel like malice.