Skip to content

ViralLoop

Your next post already worked.

← Back to the post

Loading the post

Remix this post

SaveShare

Your note

Private to you, and used when you remix this post.

Viral score

Why it worked

The mechanics

Hook
Style
Tone
Written for

Analysis by ViralLoop — not written by the original author.

Dean W. Ball on AI · ViralLoop

← Back to the post

Post by Dean W. Ball on X

Dean W. Ball@deanwball

My view for years has been that the best version of the future is one where both open-weight and closed-weight models thrive. Both have unique sets of benefits and drawbacks. I hope that the U.S. can lead in both.

367 likes50 repliesPosted Jul 24, 2026

View the original on X Written by Dean W. Ball. Captured Sep 4, 2026.

Remix this post

Your note

Private to you, and used when you remix this post.

38

Viral score

Based on absolute engagement — the platform doesn’t expose follower counts here, so large accounts score higher.

From likes, comments.

Why it worked

Ends on a short line that is easy to quote and repeat.
Written from experience rather than as advice, which is harder to argue with.
Short enough to read in full without expanding, which removes a step before the point lands.
Short sentences keep the pace up, so the reader never has to re-read a line.

The mechanics

Hook: Plain observation
Structure: Hook → Landing
Style: Conversational paragraphs at a steady pace.
Tone: personal
Written for: People building with AI

Analysis by ViralLoop — not written by the original author.

Topics

Posts built the same way

Attorney General Pamela Bondi

At my direction, early this morning federal agents arrested Don Lemon, Trahern Jeen Crews, Georgia Fort, and Jamael Lydell Lundy, in connection with the coordinated attack on Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota. More details soon.

For those confused why the US state and Silicon Valley are having a meltdown on twitter today. China released multiple AI models that are 50x more efficient than the best American AI models and made them open source, ruining the AI market

Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.

I am very excited about AI, but to go off-script for a minute: I built an app with Codex last week. It was very fun. Then I started asking it for ideas for new features and at least a couple of them were better than I was thinking of. I felt a little useless and it was sad.

Hi! I'm one of the prompt writers that worked on this ad. It's a lot harder than people think! Prompts that my team used include: -make it funny -make it epic AND funny -funnier!!! Please be nice to my team as many of them will be laid off/replaced by AI

It’s patently absurd that Apple isn’t smart enough to make their own AI, yet is somehow capable of ensuring that OpenAI will protect your security & privacy! Apple has no clue what’s actually going on once they hand your data over to OpenAI. They’re selling you down the river.

More from Dean W. Ball

As promised, and with thanks to @jachiam0 for his great tweet that inspired me to finally put the finishing touches on this: This week, on Hyperdimensional: the impending rise of ownerless agents--AIs that are independent economic actors--and what to do about it.

By the way, it really is true that I have been supportive of open-weight models for years. Those who were in the weeds of the SB 1047 debate will recall that many of my criticisms of that bill related to its potential impact on open-weight models. I communicated poorly last week

There are many people in the policy world, left and right, who saw chatbots, pattern matched to social media/attention economy issues, and suited up for a repeat of that same policy fight, who now find themselves totally unprepared for the agents. I tried to warn; so did others.

We don’t know whether this will happen, but it’s been surprising that discussions of open-weight AI broadly, and Chinese open-weight in particular, operate in an alternate reality where government security concerns don’t exist, or somehow only apply to closed-weight models.

“What has the AI industry even done for America.” “Well, it handed a collective $200b of itself to Donald Trump.” Half the country instantly hates you, and even a decent chunk of Republicans will assume this is corrupt by default.

I want to be clear that I’m not criticizing Fable for: 1. Pricing 2. The bio/cyber safeguards (yes they’re overeager, but I can deal) 3. The 30-day retention policy These things all seem fine. It is solely the silent sabotage that creates an awful precedent to which I object.